The proposed renovations to Pearson Hall and Bulfinch Hall aroused opposition from some students and faculty after they were unveiled to the school last week; others, however, were excited about the proposed facilities. The latest renovation proposal primarily consisted of moving the Classics and Religion/Philosophy Departments to an addition to Bulfinch, changing Pearson into a Community Center, and renovating Commons – all for about $51 million, as opposed to the projected $42 million for the Commons “Plan C” alone. As the second oldest building on campus – built in 1818 by renowned architect Charles Bulfinch, and relocated to its current site 1922 – Pearson has captivated the hearts of students and faculty members alike. Those who attend classes in Pearson seem to have had the strongest negative reaction to the new plans. Other community members also do not wish to see Pearson’s historic condition altered. Sarah Takvorian ’06 said, “I think [the Academy] needs to be cognizant of keeping the historic charm and character [of the school].” However, many members of the community also support the new renovation plans. Most of the supporters are either excited to see change in general, or are pleased that renovation funds are being distributed among buildings other than Commons. Jon Adler ’08 said, “I’m just excited for the construction to get underway. They’ve been talking about various plans for a few years, and I’m disappointed that we will not get to use the new facilities.” Dean of Students and Residential Life Marlys Edwards noted that although PA’s attachment to Pearson is based on its historic condition, the building has changed since its construction. Ms. Edwards said, “The plans for the renovation will bring the building back to something resembling its original architecture.” Even students opposed to the renovation can see the benefits of the latest plans. Pearson is the prime location for a Community Center; it is in the middle of campus, so both students and faculty could pass through the building between classes. Nevertheless, some students are taking action to prevent any changes to Pearson. Paz Mendez-Hodes ’07, a current Latin student, has started a petition in an attempt to compel the administration to reconsider its plans. Peter McCarthy ’07, who does not attend class in Pearson, said, “I think the petition is a very good idea. Pearson is a really cool building and I think they are going to trash the place.” Joey Atiba ’09 said, “I think it’d be awesome, and it would really benefit the community to have a bigger area where we can relax.” Sarah Dewey ’07 noted that the desk behind the one she sits in has a signature from 1923. The community is aware of the widespread desire to maintain the historical architecture on campus. Ms. Edwards said, “We will do our best to preserve what students love most about Pearson, including the windows.” Instructor in Classics Nicholas Kip said, “On the surface…it sounds wonderful…[but] obviously if I had my choice, I would save Pearson Hall.” Instructor in Classics Catherine Carter said, “I know Commons needs some work, but I’ll really miss teaching in a building with as much character as Pearson has…I can’t imagine a building better suited to teaching the classics.” Most of those against the plan are focused on maintaining Pearson’s current state, but some are also charmed by Bulfinch’s antiquity, and worry the addition will alter the character of the building.
